Uncritical semantics is the myth of a museum in which the exhibits are meanings and the words are labels. To switch languages is t...o change the labels.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
In fact, of course, I hold that propositions that contemporary philosophers would properly count as 'empirical' can be necess...ary and be known to be such.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
Let's call something a rigid designator if in every possible world it designates the same object, a non-rigid or accidental design...ator if that is not the case. Of course we don't require that the objects exist in all possible worlds.... When we think of a property as essential to an object we usually mean that it is true of that object in any case where it would have existed. A rigid designator of a necessary existent can be called strongly rigid.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
Certainly the philosopher of 'possible worlds' must take care that his technical apparatus not push him to ask questions whose mea...ningfulness is not supported by our original intuitions of possibility that gave the apparatus its point.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
There is, I confess, a hazard to the philosophical analysis of humor. If one rereads the passages that have been analyzed, one may... no longer be able to laugh at them. This is an occupational hazard: Philosophy is taking the laughter out of humor.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
If we call the world of "things"Mof physical objects--the first world, and the world of subjective experiences (such as thought pr...ocesses) the second world, we may call the world of statements in themselves the third world.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
The variables of quantification, 'something,' 'nothing,' 'everything,' range over our whole ontology, whatever it may be; and we a...re convicted of a particular ontological presupposition if, and only if, the alleged presuppositum has to be reckoned among the entities over which our variables range in order to render one of our affirmations true.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »