Chaucer's characters are sufficiently distinct from one another, but they are too little varied in themselves, too much like ident...ical propositions.... Chaucer's characters are narrative, Shakespeare's dramatic, Milton's epic. That is, Chaucer told only as much of his story as he pleased, as was required for a particular purpose. He answered for his characters himself. In Shakespeare they are introduced upon the stage, are liable to be asked all sorts of questions, and are forced to answer for themselves. In Chaucer we perceive a fixed essence of character. In Shakespeare there is a continual composition and decomposition of its elements, a fermentation of every particle in the whole mass, by its alternate affinity to other principles which are brought in contact with it. Till the experiment is tried, we do not know the result, the turn which the character will take in its new circumstances.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
He is the poet of the dawn, who wrote The Canterbury Tales and his old age... Made beautiful with song; and as I read I hear the crowing cock, I hear the note Of lark and linnet, and from every page Rise odors of ploughed field or flowery mead.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
In Homer and Chaucer there is more of the innocence and serenity of youth than in the more modern and moral poets. The Iliad is no...t Sabbath but morning reading, and men cling to this old song, because they still have moments of unbaptized and uncommitted life, which give them an appetite for more.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
We admire Chaucer for his sturdy English wit.... But though it is full of good sense and humanity, it is not transcendent poetry. ...For picturesque description of persons it is, perhaps, without a parallel in English poetry; yet it is essentially humorous, as the loftiest genius never is.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
On the whole, Chaucer impresses us as greater than his reputation, and not a little like Homer and Shakespeare, for he would have ...held up his head in their company.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
His genius does not soar like Milton's, but is genial and familiar. It shows great tenderness and delicacy, but not the heroic sen...timent. It is only a greater portion of humanity with all its weakness.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
Chaucer's remarkably trustful and affectionate character appears in his familiar, yet innocent and reverent, manner of speaking of... his God. He comes into his thought without any false reverence, and with no more parade than the zephyr to his ear.... There is less love and simple, practical trust in Shakespeare and Milton. How rarely in our English tongue do we find expressed any affection for God! Herbert almost alone expresses it, "Ah, my dear God!"LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
Chaucer is fresh and modern still, and no dust settles on his true passages. It lightens along the line, and we are reminded that ...flowers have bloomed, and birds sung, and hearts beaten in England. Before the earnest gaze of the reader, the rust and moss of time gradually drop off, and the original green life is revealed. He was a homely and domestic man, and did breathe quite as modern men do.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »
Chaucer had eminently the habits of a literary man and a scholar. There were never any times so stirring that there were not to be... found some sedentary still. He was surrounded by the din of arms. The battles of Hallidon Hill and Neville's Cross, and the still more memorable battles of Cressy and Poictiers, were fought in his youth; but these did not concern our poet much, Wickliffe and his reform much more. He regarded himself always as one privileged to sit and converse with books. He helped to establish the literary class.LESSATTRIBUTION DETAIL »